President Trump questioned Thursday why Attorney General Jeff Sessions has not taken any action against former FBI lawyer Lisa Page who has ignored a subpoena to testify before Congress.
Ms. Page, who was briefly part of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian collusion during the 2016 election, has refused to comply with a subpoena to testify before the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform Committees.
On Wednesday, the chairs of both committees threatened to hold Ms. Page in contempt if she does not appear before Congress by Friday morning. Her attorney, Amy Jeffress, said in statement on Wednesday that they didn’t have enough time to prepare for the hearing. Ms. Jeffress asked Congress for another date for a closed-door interview and accused Republican lawmakers of bullying tactics.
— overpasses4America (@o4america) July 12, 2018
The president questioned why Mr. Sessions hasn’t stepped in to force Ms. Page to testify. A frequent target of the president’s ire, Mr. Sessions has recused himself from the Russia investigation, which has clearly irritated the president. In the past, Mr. Trump has said that he would not have picked Mr. Sessions to be attorney general if he was going to recuse himself.
Trump’s remarks come as Ms. Page’s lover, FBI agent Peter Strzok is set to testify openly before Congress. Last month, Mr. Strozk testified privately before two house committees for 11 hours.
Judicial Watch recently released 16 pages of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) documents related to the June 2016 tarmac meeting between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton showing involvement of the FBI’s former Chief of Counterespionage Peter Strzok.
In a previously unseen email, on July 1, 2016, Strzok forwarded to Bill Priestap, assistant director of FBI counterintelligence, and other FBI officials an article in The New York Times titled then “ Lynch to Remove Herself From Decision Over Clinton Emails, Official Says.”
Priestap comments on it, saying: “The meeting in PX is all over CNN TV news this morning …” Strzok replies: “Timing’s not ideal in that it falsely adds to those seeking the ‘this is all choreographed’ narrative. But I don’t think it’s worth changing … later won’t be better.” Priestap responds “Agreed.”
Another Strzok email suggest the decision on the Clinton email matter has been under discussion since April 2016—three months before then-FBI Director James Comey announced he would recommend no prosecution.
On July 3, 2016, an email with the subject line “Must Read Security Article” someone from the FBI’s Security Division (SECD) forwards the article in the Observer and reveals concern:
I believe that the source quoted in the article is one of the local Phoenix LEO’s [law enforcement officers]. Needless to say that I have contacted the Phoenix office and will contact the local’s [sic] who assisted in an attempt to stem any further damage. This is exactly why our Discretion and Judgement are the foundation of the AG’s trust in our team, which is why we can never violate that trust, like the source did in this article.”
In a July 1, 2016 email exchange FBI Section Chief Rachel Rojas warns a colleague to “stay away” from discussion of the Clinton Lynch tarmac meeting following publication of the meeting, unless they hear from a “higher up”.
The colleague responds the next day, telling Rojas not to worry because, “I know better ” He/she adds that “it was DOJ opa [Office of Public Affairs] who threw us under the bus.”
Rojas replies “Doj is likely overwhelmed so in [sic] hoping it wasn’t intentional. I know it wasn’t you guys because I know you have great judgement. Nothing good would come from that. Her staff should have avoided that scenario. The bu[reau] will be fine but obviously disappointed on how this is happening. Unfortunately, she’s taking heat from all over the place and I feel bad for her. I know she didn’t want this on her plate or for this to happen.”
The colleague then concludes by saying that he/she thought the leaker was “a Phoenix cop assisting with the motorcade.”
“These emails are astonishing, no wonder the FBI hid them from Judicial Watch and the court,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “They show anti-Trump, pro-Clinton FBI Agent Peter Strzok admitting the decision not to prosecute the Clinton email issue was made back in April 2016 – long before even Hillary Clinton was interviewed. And the new emails show that the FBI security had the political objective of protecting then-Director Comey from ‘embarrassment’—which is, frankly, disturbing.” (Continue reading Judicial Watch’s findings here.)
Mr Americana, Overpasses News Desk
July 12th, 2018