National News

Rebellion Against Francis Grows As Catholic Philosopher says To DISOBEY Pope If He Is Wrong #o4anews #Catholic

Mr Americana, Overpasses News Desk
November 10th, 2017

Catholics around the world have been having problems with Pope Francis from the first day he was in office. His global-Marxist views, honed while growing up in socialist Argentina, are to many Catholics, contrary to Catholicism and Christianity.

Attendance at Mass in the western world has continued to decline as Francis rattles off time and time again, dogma that is contrary to everything Catholics were taught to believe.

Trending: Japan Supreme Court Rules Transgenders Must Be Sterilized #Japan #Transgender #LGBTQ

High ranking clergy have openly spoken out against Pope Francis, and talks of a very real schism, or split of the church happening, with the Vatican no longer recognized as the seat of Catholicism happening.

A world-renowned Catholic philosopher said that faithful Catholics “have an obligation” not to follow or obey the Pope if he clearly contradicts perennial teachings of the Catholic Church.

Dr. Josef Seifert, president of the new laity-led Academy for Life and close friend of the late Pope St. John Paul II, said that Catholics “have an obligation not to believe [all that the Pope teaches and writes] to be true if we see that it clearly contradicts perennial Church teaching or evident moral truth accessible to human reason, or both.”

“I think that as soon as we find that a new teaching is false, we are obliged not to obey it. And as soon as we find a new pastoral decision of the Pope inapplicable in good conscience, such as giving the sacraments to unrepentant sinners on the basis of an (impossible for us) ‘discernment’ of whether their sin is compatible with their being in the state of grace for subjective reasons, we are likewise morally obliged not to obey it,” he said.

Quoting from the Acts of the Apostles, Seifert said that when it comes to the perennial truths of the Catholic faith, Catholics “have to obey God more than men.”

The philosopher made the comments in an interview with OnePeterFive’s Maike Hickson published November 7.

His comments come at a time when arguments between Catholic thinkers are raging over to what extent Catholics owe fidelity to controversial teachings of Pope Francis .

Seifert said in the interview that numerous Catholics worldwide who are trying to be faithful to the Church mistakenly hold that everything the pope utters or writes must receive their unconditional consent.

But there can be no real “unity with the Pope” unless there is a prior unity based on “truth,” he said.

“To agree with the Pope, have unity with the Pope, on an error is of no value whatsoever,” he said.

“On the contrary: as Saint Thomas and the Acts of the Apostles stated clearly, in such a case the subordinate has an obligation to criticize his superior, even publicly, as St. Paul criticized St. Peter,” he added.

Seifert outlined why he thinks one of the foremost defenders of Amoris Laetitia, Professor Rocco Buttiglione, is wrong in his arguments that Catholics must adhere to the exhortation.

“Buttiglione holds that as Catholics, we have to believe to be true whatever the Pope says in the exercise of his Ordinary Magisterium, while I agree that, yes, we have an obligation to look first for the truth contained in a magisterial document and to try to interpret it in the light of the truth expressed in the tradition, but do not have any absolute obligation whatsoever to believe that every part of a pronouncement of the ordinary papal magisterium is true or compatible with the perennial teaching of the Church,” said Seifert.

“Moreover, we have an obligation not to believe it to be true if we see that it clearly contradicts a) perennial Church teaching or b) evident moral truth accessible to human reason, or c) both,” he added.

Seifert said it amounts to “papolatry,” a worshiping of the pope, to insist that Catholics “have an absolute duty to accept everything a Pope or Council are saying,” insofar as it is “not dogmatic and de fide [of the faith], and if he has good reason to believe that it is contrary to natural or revealed truth or to both.”

Seifert laid out four arguments against the exhortation being an exercise of the Pope’s Ordinary Magisterium, and much more, which you can read BY CLICKING HERE.

Tell us what you think in comments below!
For other important news,CLICK HERE


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.