American Politics

Planned Parenthood Threatens Mass Layoffs & Closing of Genocide Centers #abortion #PlannedParenthood

After losing in court earlier this month, Planned Parenthood is seeking an emergency injunction in its appeal to stop the Department of Health and Human Services from adding the Protect Life Rule — because, they say, they would be “irreparably harmed” by it.

As Live Action News previously reported, “under the new rules, Title X projects will not be allowed to refer women for abortions. Any organization that receives family planning funds will also be required to keep facilities where abortions are committed separate from facilities where family planning care is provided.”

Courthouse News reports that U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden previously ruled that “the challenge was premature since the awards have not yet been granted,” but Planned Parenthood is saying if they wait and then don’t receive the money from taxpayers, they may have to pare down operations or close facilities:

Trending: Scientists Terrified After Study Shows Mysterious, Massive Global Drop In Insect Population #science #insect #study

Attorney Paul Wolfson… said Tuesday that if his clients do not receive grants for the upcoming fiscal year, which the Department of Health and Human Services is poised to award mid-August, they will have to lay staff off in mass and possibly shutter clinics….”

Courthouse News adds, “Department of Justice attorney Alicia Hunt meanwhile argued that any perceived harm to Planned Parenthood and the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association is ‘speculative’ at this point, since they remain eligible to be awarded Title X grants.”

CLICK HERE FOR RELATED NEWS.

While Planned Parenthood publicly emphasizes its “health services” and downplays the abortion side of its business, it is revealing that Planned Parenthood’s attorney seems to believe Planned Parenthood will no longer qualify for Title X funding.

Again – the qualifications are that Title X recipients cannot refer women for abortions, and that they need to separate their abortion facilities from the facilities where other “family planning” services are offered.

There have been (and may still be) individual Planned Parenthood facilities which do not offer abortion services — however, because abortion is profitable (and Planned Parenthood does more than 300,000 annually, holding 35% of the market share), Planned Parenthood announced in 2010 that abortions must be offered in at least one facility per affiliate. This caused some affiliates to split from the abortion giant so that they could offer family planning services without abortion.

Planned Parenthood attorneys lamented the idea that the new HHS rule would affect the abortion giant, “leaving millions of Title X patients without much-needed health care.” But we already know that Federally Qualified Health Centers can absorb, if need be, Planned Parenthood’s 2.5 million (or so) patients each year. Live Action News’ Carole Novielli reported in 2017:

This claim is patently false and was previously dismantled by the defenders of ObamaCare…. In other words, yes, FQHCs can handle Planned Parenthood’s patient load.

After all, Planned Parenthood has lost more than half a million patients (600,000) since 2011, while taxpayer-funded health centers, as identified by the federal Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), saw a 2 million patient increase by 2015, providing care to 24,295,946 patients.

If Planned Parenthood closes some facilities — as it has been doing on its own, even while increasing its federal funding, for years now — women will still have access to health care.

Meanwhile, studies definitively show the main reason for abortion has absolutely nothing to do with “women’s health”.

Why do women have abortions?

As important a question as that is, it’s hard to find a reliable answer. For more than a decade, the Guttmacher Institute has listed the same three reasons on their abortion fact sheet.

Based on a 2004 survey of 1,209 post-abortive women at nine different facilities, they report the following:

Three-fourths of aborting women have an abortion because they can’t afford a child.
Three-fourths of aborting women have an abortion because a child would interfere with their life (work, school, etc).
Half of aborting women have an abortion because they don’t want to be a single parent.

You don’t have to be a statistician to notice that these percentages don’t seem to add up. How can you have more than 100% of something? This apparent discrepancy owes to the fact that each respondent was allowed to give more than one reason for having an abortion.

Most respondents chose four (out of 13 possibilities); some women selected as many as eight. Though the 8-page surveys were ostensibly designed to allow for very specific and thorough responses, the reported conclusions provide little more than sweeping generalizations.

This is almost assuredly what the Guttmacher Institute wanted. It gives them and their cohorts at Planned Parenthood the opportunity to say that 3/4 of all abortions happen because the woman can’t afford a baby—even if finances were a relatively minor consideration in the overall decision-making process.

If you dig into the data deeper, you’ll see that only 23% of respondents identified the inability to afford a child as the main reason for having an abortion. Along the same lines, not wanting to be a single parent was the main reason for abortion in only 8% of respondents, and only 4% of respondents identified school or work concerns as the most important reason.

The number one most important reason for having an abortion—I’m not ready for a child right now—was selected by 25% of respondents.

Strangely, it’s not even listed as such on the abortion fact sheet. Wouldn’t it have been more more honest and helpful to highlight the most important reasons? Probably, but there’s an agenda in play here.

It’s in the financial best interests of the abortion industry to make the reasons for abortion sound as sympathetic as they possibly can, and they do a remarkable job at it. I’m guessing this is why other notable numbers were left off their fact sheet.

For instance, these are some of the survey statistics that you won’t find on their abortion facts page:

Only 4% of respondents cited health concerns as their main reason for abortion.
Only 3% of respondents cited possible fetal abnormalities as their main reason for abortion.
Less than 0.5% of respondents cited rape as their main reason for abortion.
Only 1% of respondents cited rape as a reason for their abortion.
6% of respondents cited parental pressure as a reason for their abortion.
14% of respondents cited partner pressure as a reason for their abortion.
25% of respondents cited the desire to keep their sexual activity a secret as a reason for their abortion.

None of these statistics fit the standard pro-abortion narrative, which overemphasizes the hard cases and underemphasizes the external pressures working to coerce women into an unwanted abortion.

Be that as it may, we can look to the state of Florida for a far more current and representative window into the reasons women choose abortion.

Though it doesn’t receive much public attention, Florida records and publishes the given reason for every abortion performed within its borders.

Below you will find the percentage and reason for all 71,740 abortions that were performed in Florida in 2015:

None of these statistics fit the standard pro-abortion narrative, which overemphasizes the hard cases and underemphasizes the external pressures working to coerce women into an unwanted abortion.

Be that as it may, we can look to the state of Florida for a far more current and representative window into the reasons women choose abortion.

Though it doesn’t receive much public attention, Florida records and publishes the given reason for every abortion performed within its borders.

Below you will find the percentage and reason for all 71,740 abortions that were performed in Florida in 2015:

What does all this mean? It means that almost 99% of Florida abortions are performed on healthy women, with healthy babies, who chose to have sex. There was nothing problematic with the circumstances of conception and nothing problematic with the health of the mother or baby.

Secondly, according to these numbers, only 6% of Florida abortions are performed for economic reasons. Taken altogether, more than 92% of the abortions performed in Florida have nothing to do with “necessity” and everything to do with expedience.

Said differently, more than 92% of the abortions performed in Florida happen for reasons that even abortion-advocates struggle to justify.

IF YOU ENJOYED THIS NEWS STORY, CLICK HERE TO READ MORE.

James E Windsor, Overpasses News Desk
July 29th, 2018

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.