National News

NY Times Newest Board Member Doesn’t Like ‘Dumba** F***ing White People’ #NYTimes #racist #Democrats

Democrats are the party of hate, racism, division, and pure evil. They have proven it with their actions and history, and the KKK even donated $20,000 to Hillary’s failed presidential campaign in 2016. Hillary herself once called KKK Grand Wizard Robert Byrd “the heart and soul of the Democratic Party.”

It goes on and on, with Democrats opposing desegregation, creating Jim Crow laws, banning inter-racial marriage, and the list goes on and on and on. Even now in 2018 they’re bringing back race segregation in colleges.

But if that’s not enough, meet Sarah Jeong. She’s the newest member of the New York Times editorial board. She also has a history of saying pretty vile, racist things on Twitter.

A sample of Ms. Jeong’s “Old-Gray-Lady-Worthy” opinions:

Trending: WATCH! Sweden Burning – Rampaging Barbarians Unleash Firebomb Attacks In Multiple Cities #Sweden #crime #immigration

“Dumba** f***ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on a fire hydrant”

“Are white people predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically only being fit to live underground like groveling goblins”

“Oh man it’s kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men”

“I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play ‘Things white people can definitely take credit for,” it’s really hard”

“#CancelWhitePeople”

Now imagine if the New York Times had hired a white man who tweeted the exact same things, but change white to black in the tweets.

Democrats would be outside their house with torches and pitchforks. You know they would.

After all, we do live in a world where conservative voices are silenced and riots are started on college campuses over the scheduling of right-of-center speeches. Speeches delivered by the meek likes of Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson.

Jordan Peterson. The man is a Canadian. I mean, who’s ever been intimidated by a Canadian (not including hockey players.)

Where the entirety of these speeches that are found worthy of violence and censorship is merely a respectful and erudite recitation of conservative principles and values. No epithets. No calls for violence. No name calling. Just conservative ideas.

And that is worthy of a riot, but Jeong’s blatant racism is acceptable, because she hates the right people to please the Democrat left.

And here we have what can only be described as racist, threatening, demeaning (dare I say “triggering?”) views and they are not just tolerated and accepted they are celebrated and elevated.

If the New York Times pretends they knew nothing about these tweets when they elevated Ms. Jeong to their editorial board they will be admitting that they are the stupidest, most irresponsible and naive media organization in the 21st century. How do you not vet a potential hire in the media world without checking their digital and social media footprint?

If they claim they knew but they embrace the diverse voice of Ms. Jeong regardless of her volatile language, then so be it. At least we know where we all stand with each other.

CLICK HERE FOR RELATED NEWS.

She later tried to quell the Twitter storm with a “statement”. It didn’t help.

IF YOU ENJOYED THIS NEWS STORY, CLICK HERE TO READ MORE.

James E Windsor, Overpasses News Desk
August 2nd, 2018

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.