National News

Funeral Home Loses In Appeals Court After Firing Employee For Coming To Work In Drag #funeral #news

It’s being called a big win with national significance for mentally ill transgender rights and a devastating loss for sanity.

A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of a man who imagines he is a woman, and was fired by a Garden City funeral home after (s)he disclosed (s)him’s mental illness drove (s)him to transition to female (have his penis lopped off & sex change operation), and began dressing like a woman.

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Home discriminated against director Aimee Stephens, formerly Anthony Stephens, by firing (s)him in 2013.

Trending: What In the World Is Happening In Germany? A Citizen Speaks Out! *VIDEO* #Germany #refugee #invasion

Attorney Dan Korobkin with the American Civil Liberties Union says management never denied that Stephens was fired because (s)he informed officials of (s)him’s decision.

“In too many workplaces all of the country, coming out as trans is still seen as a fire-able offense,” Korobkin told WWJ Newsradio 950’s Sandra McNeill. “That’s exactly what was experienced by Amy Stephens in this case.”

“So this ruling,” he said, “affirms that that kind of firing is unlawful.”

The owners of the funeral home, who did not immediately return a call for comment, argued in court that transitioning to another gender is against their beliefs, CBS Detroit reports.

“That could be a religious belief that someone has, but at this same time most people understand that it’s wrong to decriminalize, and it’s wrong to fire someone from their job that they’re doing perfectly well just because they’re transgender.”

Attorney Doug Wardlow, who represented the business in the case v. the EEOC said Stephens violated the company’s sex-specific dress code and that employees are simply asked to dress “in a manner sensitive to grieving family members and friends.”

As far as the dress code is concerned, the EEOC learned the funeral home provided clothing to male workers dealing with the public but not females. The appellate judges ruled that it was reasonable for the EEOC to investigate and discover the “seemingly discriminatory clothing-allowance policy.”

CLICK HERE for related content.

In a 2016 interview with WWJ, Wardlow said his client was simply looking out for the best interests of the bereaved, adding that “Numerous courts have recognized that companies may differentiate between men and women in their dress and grooming policies without violating Title VII.”

The appellate court decision returns the case to a federal judge who had dismissed the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

IF YOU ENJOYED THIS NEWS STORY, CLICK HERE TO READ MORE.

Mr Americana, Overpasses News Desk
March 8th, 2018

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.